Skip to content

2008 Moral Olympics

Aye, what topsy-turvy times we know.

Would Phidippides have any idea what we mean by Olympic in 2008? For that matter, do we have a clear idea?

The sporting event that was invented in 1896 seems to have taken its name from Olympian as a reference to something of great stature, possibly superhuman. In that regard one might think of Olympic as something heroic, involving struggle, self-sacrifice and some sort of noble cause.

So when the modern Olympiad appears to revolve less around personal endurance than around a bizarre sytem of ever-larger urban development schemes and patronage coupled with craven politics, it’s easy to read the following snippet as a return to the proper values of heroic struggle. Not in ancient Athens, but in today’s Paris.

At the start of the relay, a man identified as a Green Party activist was grabbed by security officers as he headed for 1997 400-meter world champion Stephane Diagana, who was carrying the torch from the first floor of the Eiffel Tower.

The man was tackled before he got close to Diagana.

The procession continued but, soon after, a crowd of activists waving Tibetan flags confronted the torchbearer on a road along the Seine River. The demonstrators did not appear to get close to the torch, but its flame was put out by security officers and brought on board a bus.

Less than an hour later, the flame was being carried out of a Paris traffic tunnel by an athlete in a wheelchair when the procession was halted by activists who booed and chanted “Tibet.” Once again, the torch was temporarily extinguished and put on a bus despite protesters’ apparent failure to get close.

The torch was put out for the third time when police interrupted the procession as a precaution because they spotted a crowd of demonstrators on a nearby bridge. [National Geographic]

Someone draws an apt parallel with the alpine character of Tibet, and to the struggle between authoritarian rule, local resistance and spontaneous action.

“One would almost think oneself in Lhasa,” said Jean-Paul Ribes, leader of the Support Committee of the Tibetan People in France, who was among the thousands massed on the Trocadéro. “It snowed last night, now the sky is blue — and police are everywhere.”

 

Many protesters — demonstrating against China’s human rights policies in general or for a free Tibet, or simply advocating a boycott of the Olympics in Beijing — echoed a headline that was emblazoned across the front page of the leftist daily Libération, under a picture of the Olympic rings restyled as handcuffs: “Liberate the Olympic Games!” [NY Times]

This reads like a new form of Olympic event while remaining closer to the original motivation for running to Athens, in the struggles between various mythical figures, the socio-political context of ancient games, or in the current geopolitical struggles over Tibet, both moral and physical. The torch relay has other historic connotations of epic struggle, so the controversy of this year’s relay has plenty of precedent. The struggle has occurred partly in London, where

police circulated among Tibetan demonstrators ordering them to remove T-shirts and confiscating Tibetan flags in an apparent breach of a promise from Met commanders that police would not intervene to prevent embarrassment to Beijing. Yonten Ngama, a Tibetan who has been resident in the UK for four years, was ordered to remove a T-shirt scrawled with three slogans, ‘China Stop the Killing’, ‘No Torch in Tibet’ and ‘Talk to the Dalai Lama’. “They didn’t tell me why, they just said I couldn’t wear it,” he said. Police on the ground declined to comment on the reasons for confiscating the T-shirt. [Guardian]

while a different kind of authority was evident in the behaviour of moral athletes

Once the torch had been lit it took less than five minutes for the protesters to make their presence felt. As it was about to be passed on to a red London bus a protester leapt from the crowd and was bundled to the floor by security personnel. This pattern was repeated throughout the day as the huge crowds that turned out for the 2004 Athens torch relay stayed away, leaving the streets to Chinese nationals, the regime’s detractors, battle buses hired by the sponsors and the massive police presence. At Ladbroke Grove, shortly after the flame had passed from the bus to relay runners, it was almost wrestled from the hands of TV presenter Konnie Huq. [ditto]

The moral olympics. What an idea. Would that the spectacle of athletics were rescued from institutions of civic, commercial and journalistic capitalism and recast as some kind of personal and moral struggle for peace, justice, and ethical standards. Peter Tatchell would get a silver medal.

 

Considered from that angle, the torch relay is turning into a PR disaster for the People’s Republic, and for authoritarian tendencies in London, Paris and elsewhere as protests in one city after another dominate coverage of the event, and a parallel human rights torch relay makes its way around the globe, nearly coinciding with the Olympic relay in San Francisco. That the organising committee dared to include San Francisco on the tour is something to marvel at.

True to form

the city board supervisors passed a resolution protesting China’s poor human rights record ahead of the Olympic torch’s visit to the city. The resolution asks city officials to express their disapproval when they receive the Beijing Olympic Torch on April 9. [SF Torch ]

Or, as San Francisco Chronicle opinionator CW Nevius put it

God only knows why San Francisco was picked as the only North American city for an Olympic torch run. Don’t they read the news?

 

Even longtime Olympics veteran Scott Givens, who headed up San Francisco’s 2016 bid to host the Games, says he knew there would be protests in this progressive city. “That’s what makes us all love San Francisco,” he said. “It is the democracy of democracies. That’s what makes San Francisco great.” [SF Gate ]

So true. And so right that the torch procession is subject to a different sort of heat.

Addendum

In China, government officials warned against attempts to disrupt the torch as it travels through Tibet on the most controversial leg of the tour.

“If someone dares to sabotage the torch relay in Tibet and its scaling of Mount Everest, we will seriously punish him and will not be soft-handed,” said Qiangba Puncog, governor of the Tibetan Autonomous Region, at a press conference in Beijing.

“For these separatist forces, the Olympics in Beijing will be a rare opportunity. Therefore they wish to create major troubles or incidents. I don’t doubt they will create trouble during the torch relay in Tibet.” [Guardian]

This might be a disproportionate response. ‘Sabotage’ is a very loose term. Is having a rally sabotage? We will have to wait and see. The threat of serious, hard-handed punishment in response to the equivalent of pie-throwing would be very disappointing.

{ 1 } Comments

  1. David Lee | April 8, 2008 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    I find most protesters these days over Tibet truly hypocritical, ignorant of history, and reeks of double standards. For the Caucasian readers - how many of you truly reflect on your own country’s behavior in the not-too-recent past. For the Americans, where are the native aboriginals today (the ones called Red Indians, Redskins, or whatever other names you imposed?) The ones who are left have to live on the worst patches called reservations, living on Bingo games, dignity destroyed, wrecked by alcoholism, substance abuse, broken families. Let’s not mince words, it was, still is, human and cultural genocide. And the Australians with their aborigines, the New Zealanders with the Maoris, how about the English with the Scots, with the Irish? Why is Northern Ireland not part of Eire? Why does Spain not give independence to the Basques? Why does most of English Canada oppose Quebec independence? It was not that long ago the French army was still torturing Algerians. It was not that long ago the French Government orchestrated the blowing up of the Rainbow Warrior in New Zealand. Why are there still overseas colonies by the French, Dutch, Brits, Spain, Americans, half way round the world from their home countries? Why is Greenland a colony of Denmark? What about US conduct - in Iraq. Weapons of mass destruction?. What are they doing about the almost 3 million Iraqi refugees today? How many people, soldiers, women and children including, are being slaughtered everyday there? There was only one reason for that invasion - OIL. For other readers, look deep inside your own country’s history. Hardly any one country does not have some skeleton in their closets. A bit on Tibetan/China history. Tibet had during various periods in the last 2 thousand years had strong ties with the main part (Han Chinese dominated) of China. I don’t have to go too far back. During the last Chinese Imperial Dynasty, Tibet was subservient to the Beijing court, and acknowledged that by the practice that all the grand lamas (several sects, including Panchen, Da Lai, etc) had to have their legitimate ascendency validated by the Chinese Emperor. The legalistic term used for that relationship is “suzerainty”. How many of you knew that? When the Brits colonized India, they negotiated the boundary between India (there was no such thing then, but simply what was India today) and the Tibet region with the Chinese Qing Imperial Court. The resulting demarcation was called the McMahon Line. Why didn’t they negotiate with the nation of Tibet, if there was such. Anyway, history or not, China is what it is today. Just like the USA, Canada, Brazil, India, Pakistan, the UK, South Africa. We can all bob and weave, and try to justify why we are what we are, but I have never seen any arguments that are any stronger than the rationate for why Tibet is part of China, and that no double standards are utilized. What about India gobbling up Sikkim. Did the rest of the world make any fuss? How about today’s USA giving Manhattan back to the aboriginals, for maybe 6 strings of beads? Or reversing the decision not to allow the South to declare independence, or return Texas to Mexico? Or return Florida to the Seminoles? Or return the US of A to the “Redskins”. The Speaker of the US House, Miss Pelosi, when was the last time she mentioned anything about the plight of the American natives? How about the torture at Abu Grayab? How about waterboarding that was used there? Does it sit well with her, and the world’s conscience, as she so nobly put it? The football team in Washington D.C., right under the noses of all the esteemed US Government, senators, congressmen, is called the Redskins. This is a derogatory name that fully illustrates the biase and blind spots that exist. In Pekin, Illinois, the High Scool athletic team is called the Pekin Chinks, a totally derogatory term for the Chinese that dates back to the times when Chinese Americans were treated as trash, while dying by the hundreds, if not thousands, to construct the trans-USA railroad. During the 2nd World War, the Japanese Americans were all forcibly sent way to the middle of nowhere. Why didn’t they intern all the German-Americans? The Christian bible quoted Jesus saying something like - do not look past the timber before you to pick out a splinter far away (or something to that effect). Miss Pelosi is well advised to take care more of her problems at home first. Yes, there are inequities in Tibet. Well, there are inequities in China. There are inequities in India. There are inequities in Sri Lanka. There are inequities in California. Give China credit for having had the courage to pull themselves out of the dire conditions they were in, within such a short time frame. Compare them with 10 years ago, 20 years ago, and 30 years ago. It is not perfect, there’s still a long way to go, and I believe it is going that way, and will reach there, on its own, like in its recent past. All these China-bashing is mostly racism, jealousy, and desire to look for a cause, maybe out of boredom, maybe out of a simple wish to block out their own personal problems, and supplant with a “noble” cause.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *